Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality

Home > For Health Professionals > Audits & Surgical Research > Audits of Surgical Mortality > Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality

Find a surgeon

The Find a Surgeon directory is a listing of active Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons who meet the requirements of the College's Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Program and have opted to be on the list. This list excludes retired or inactive Fellows.

Background
Qualified privilege
Audit process
Frequently asked questions
Electronic platform - Fellows interface
Reports and publications
Submission for Data Request
Forms
Seminars
Committee Meeting Dates
Contact

Background

Summary

WAASM commenced on 1 June 2001 as a pilot project, under the management of the University of Western Australia.

In 2005 management of the project was transferred to the College. The WAASM Management Committee oversees the project which constitutes an invaluable foundation to the running and success of the audit program.

The project is funded by the Western Australian Department of Health (WADH).

In November 2006, the WADH issued an operational directive stating that all deaths that occur in public hospitals and licensed private health care facilities providing services for public patients are required to be classified and reviewed under the Western Australian Review of Mortality (WARM). WARM came into effect on 1 January 2007. Deaths that are reviewed under the WAASM process are exempt from the WARM process.

Similar projects are now running in most states including Australian Capital Territory (ACTASM), Northern Territory (NTASM), Queensland (QASM), South Australia (SAAPM), Tasmania (TASM), and Victoria (VASM). All audits function under the umbrella of the Australian and New Zealand Audits of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM). ANZASM, as an audit process, fulfils the following criteria:

it is independent
it is external
it is peer-reviewed
it is systematic
it is routine
it is objective
it is confidential (all audits are covered by qualified privilege at a Commonwealth level).

Qualified privilege

Overview

The Qualified Privilege (QP) declaration (PDF 2.1MB) encourages surgeon participation within the mortality audits by strictly protecting the confidentiality of information gained in the audit.

Via a blend of state and commonwealth legislation, the declaration prevents third parties from using data that becomes available as a result of the prescribed activity cannot be disclosed (in reports or publications) outside of the activity in a manner that identifies a surgeon. The confidentiality of the information received is protected accordingly and high-level data security procedures are maintained.

The QP declaration allows non-identifiable data to be used in reviewing and analysing surgical procedures, while information that may identify an individual requires the expressed approval of the individual being recognised.

With state and commonwealth authority, the declaration effectively allows surgeons to confidently participate in the mortality audits, knowing information they liberally divulge will be utilised exclusively for its designed professional development purpose and nothing else.

Details

The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons received approval from the Minister of Health and Ageing to declare the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) a "quality assurance" activity under the Commonwealth QP scheme.

QP declarations encourage participation of surgeons by protecting the confidentiality of information created as part of this activity.

ANZASM is a bi-national framework of regionally based audits of surgical mortality. As of July 2007, every state in Australia has its own audit. Although regionally based, all audits are covered by an over-arching QP protection that ANZASM has obtained at the national level. In some regions, state coverage is also held.

This document explains:

how the national QP legislation imposes responsibilities for legal disclosure of audit-related information on both the regional audits and their related audit staff
what information the regional audit is permitted to disclose to hospitals (in relation to the Commonwealth QP scheme)
what information the regional audit is not permitted to disclose to hospital (in relation to the Commonwealth QP scheme)

The regional surgical mortality audits are permitted to:

provide annual state and hospital reports that contain aggregated, de-identified (with respect to surgeon and patient) data that will report on the following:
audit participation rates for their surgeons (exception: hospitals with consultant numbers less than two)
hospital specific rates of optimal or suboptimal care of patients as compared to state and national averages
information about the general quality of surgical care being undertaken at that hospital, relating to all aspects of care during a surgical admission.

The regional surgical mortality audits are not permitted to:

disclose confidential information gained from audit activities to anyone other than the surgeon involved in the case or the surgeons specifically assigned to provide a peer review assessment of the case,
a person who discloses information stemming from the declared activity either indirectly or directly to another person or a court of law faces a possible penalty of up to 2 years imprisonment (Section 124Y, Health Insurance Act 1973).

Important, to provide audit information to:

chief executive officers, or
surgical/medical/clinical directors,

at hospitals where the surgeon is practicing is not permitted by law. However, the Federal Minister of Health may authorise disclosure of information that relates to a serious offence against a law-in-force in any State or Territory. This means:

identifying information can only be disclosed with the express approval of the identified individuals.
the release of any such information would be unusual and should only occur after the implications of disclosure are properly considered.

Participating surgeons in the audit are permitted to identify other practitioners involved in the case.

Please note, ANZASM in partnership with Russell Kennedy lawyers compiled the QP guide (PDF 2.1MB). For further information about the QP scheme contact ANZASM.

Audit process

WAASM is a peer-review process. Participation by consultant surgeons is a requirement of the College's Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Program.

To start, WAASM is notified of all deaths that occur in Western Australia through The Open Patient Administration System (TOPAS). In the case of private and smaller regional hospitals that are not linked into the TOPAS system, WAASM is notified of all deaths directly by the medical records department.

Next, WAASM sends a Surgical Case Form to the consultant surgeon linked to the case. The Surgical Case Form is:

completed by the consultant surgeon or a registrar (under supervision)
returned to WAASM in the envelope provided (as soon as possible)
de-identified and sent to a first-line assessor (a consultant surgeon; same speciality, different hospital) for anonymous peer-review.

If a second-line assessment (case note review) is not requested by the first-line assessor, the original surgeon will be sent written feedback to this effect (and the case will be closed).

If a second-line assessment (case note review) is requested by the first-line assessor (that is, insufficient information has been provided on the Surgical Case Form or the case needs further investigation) then these steps are followed:

a second-line assessor is chosen by WAASM staff based upon a set of criteria created to minimise any selection bias
medical records are requested
the second-line assessor then reviews the Surgical Case Form; the medical records; and the first-line assessor's comment (comments from first- line assessor are transcribed onto the second-line assessors form), before writing a one-page report. Note: The review is carried out and the report written in a spirit of sympathetic enquiry, providing sufficient details for a clear view of events
the report and relevant feedback is sent to the original surgeon. The case is then closed.
at each stage of the process the original surgeon has right of reply.

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to participate in the WAASM?
Your participation in WAASM is a requirement if you are a surgeon in an operative based practice, have a surgical death and an audit of surgical mortality is available in your hospital.

If I participate do I have to be a first or second-line assessor?
You can choose to be a first-line assessor, and/or a second-line assessor.
You can participate in the WAASM without being a first-line assessor, and/or a second-line assessor.

Are instructions/guidelines provided for first and/or second-line assessors?
Guidelines are sent with along with surgical proformas forms. An example of a second-line assessment report (1-2 page) is also sent to you.

Is the WAASM process confidential?
All data and forms are de-identified. All data and forms are securely stored. WAASM reports are covered by qualified privilege.

How will WAASM know if a patient has died under my care?
WAASM is notified of all deaths either through TOPAS or medical records departments.

What if I need the medical records to fill out the WAASM Surgical Case Form?
Contact the medical records department of your hospital to ensure records can be located & delivered to you.

What do I do after completing the WAASM Surgical Case Form?
Please return the Surgical Case Form to WAASM in the envelope provided.
Send us an email if you have any questions or concerns.

Who do I contact if I have any queries?
Please contact the WAASM Project Manager.

Electronic platform - Fellows interface

ANZASM now offers an electronic submissions platform called Fellows interface. The paper-based submission format is still current and available. The new interface allows Fellows to self-report, complete and transmit surgical case and first-line assessment forms securely online.

The Fellows interface is an "either/or option"; you can only use the online or paper system. If you wish to change from one to the other we will have to be notified to make the necessary changes.

Those who wish to take up the online option will be sent access details, and user instructions see list of user guides below:

Fellows Interface User Guide (PDF 2.1MB)
Self-generated Notification of Death User Guide (PDF 258KB)
Third Party Delegates User Guide (PDF 190KB)
Third Party Delegation - Fellows User Guide (PDF 554KB)

The paper-based submission format is still current and available. When submitting information to the audit office, ensure that the study ID and patient UR number are clearly labelled on all the supporting documentation.

Reports and publications

Annual reports

Case Note Review

Forms

Surgical Case Form (PDF 484KB)
Surgical Case Form - Neuro (PDF 645KB)
First Line Assessment Form (PDF 405KB)
Second Line Assessment Form (PDF 401KB)
Data Request Form (PDF 1.1MB)

Manual

Fellows Interface User Guide (PDF 2.1MB)
Self-generated Notification of Death User Guide (PDF 1.1MB)

Read the WAASM newsletter (members only)

Consumer booklet

WAASM consumer booklet (PDF 332KB)

Links

School of Population Health (CHSR)
Department of Health, Western Australia
Clinical Training and Education Centre (CTEC)
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD)

Submission for Data Request

The Australia and New Zealand Audits of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) will consider requests for data and data extracts for special reports. ANZASM is a declared Quality Assurance Activity and is required to work within specific requirements of the declaration. ANZASM must protect the confidentiality of the information it receives, to respect the privacy and sensitivity of those to whom it relates and maintain high-level data security procedures. Only de-identified data can be released.

Requests for data should accompanied by a reason why the analyses are required.
Requests should have a clear & realistic plan.
Requests require approval by the audit data-request subcommittee and final endorsement by the ANZASM Steering Committee.
Once approved, requests will be prioritised and work will proceed according to the priority list.
It is expected that abstracts be progressed into manuscripts within one year.
All publications prepared from this RACS data need to be approved by the Director of RAAS, Chair RAAS and Chair ANZASM. All publications from RAAS are reported to the RACS Council.

Please email the completed data request form (PDF 1.1MB) to the RAAS Director, Wendy.Babidge@surgeons.org for national data extraction. Alternatively contact the regional audit of mortality manager for regional data extracts.

Seminars

Future events

Future events will be posted here.

Previous events

WAASM Symposium, Thursday, 24 August 2017, "The Perth Emergency Laparotomy Audit - Where to Now?". Download report (PDF 967KB)

Presentations as follows:

Mr James Aitken, National Australian data in an international context, watch video
Dr Peter Pockney, Emergency laparotomy audit in NSW, watch video
Dr Claire Stevens, Outcome of emergency laparotomy in Victoria - Dr Foster's diagnosis, watch video
Dr Mary Theophilus, A hospital's response, watch video
A/Prof David Mountain, An emergency department's response, watch video
Prof Marina Wallace, Who should operate on emergency laparotomies, watch video
Dr Audrey Koay, What a Department of Health would want from a national audit, watch video
Prof David Fletcher, A proposed Australian and New Zealand emergency laparotomy audit, watch video
Prof Guy Maddern, Concluding discussion, watch video

WAASM Symposium, Tuesday, 15 November 2016, "Futile Care and End of Life Matters". Download report (PDF 795KB)

Presentations as follows:

Prof James Aitken Introduction - Futile Care and End of Life Matters (PDF 625KB), watch video.
Hon Jim McGinty AM Parliament's Role in End of Life Matters (PDF 203KB), watch video.
Dr Penny Flett The Aged Care Sector's Role In Preparing For The End Of Life (PDF 356KB) watch video.
Dr Matthew Anstey End of Life Care - National Policy Perspective (PDF 1.2MB), watch video.
Dr Tim Paterson Fifty fifty Doc? Proceeding in Borderline Cases (PDF 815KB), watch video.
Mr Stephen Honeybul Futile Care or No Treatment (PDF 10.6 MB), watch video.
Dr Zaza Lyons and Mr Albie Lyons Futility Recovery Personal Reflection (PDF 1.9MB), watch video.
Panel discussion, watch video.

WAASM Symposium, 31 August 2015, "Transferring Surgical Patients: better organisation is required", Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research (QEII), Perth. Download the program (PDF 107KB). For more information email the WAASM office.

WAASM Symposium, February 2011, "Recognising the Deteriorating Patient". For a copy of audio/video file email the WAASM office.

Contact

All general enquiries can be directed to:
WA Audit of Surgical Mortality (WAASM)
Post: M308, University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009
Street: 184 Hampden Road, Nedlands WA 6009

Telephone: +61 8 6389 8650
Fax: +61 8 6389 8655
Email: waasm@surgeons.org

Clinical Director - Mr James Aitken
Project Manager - Franca Itotoh
Senior Project Officer - Natalie Zorbas-Connell
Project Officer - Sonya Furneyvall

back to the top

ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN
COLLEGE OF SURGEONS

ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN
COLLEGE OF SURGEONS

Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality

Find a surgeon

Background

Summary

Qualified privilege

Overview

Details

Audit process

Frequently asked questions

Electronic platform - Fellows interface

Reports and publications

Annual reports

Case Note Review

Manual

Newsletter

Consumer booklet

Links

Submission for Data Request

Seminars

Future events

Previous events

Contact